Perforated decking

ABSTRACT

A corrugated decking is provided that has a plurality of top horizontal surfaces, a plurality of bottom surfaces, and a plurality of transition surfaces, each transition surface connecting one of the top horizontal surfaces to one of the bottom surfaces. One of the top horizontal surfaces has a plurality of apertures, the apertures having downwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to perforated decking. More particularly,embodiments of the invention relate to decking used primarily inindustrial and commercial racks and walkways.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Decking or shelving used in industrial and commercial storage racks hasto be designed and constructed to bear heavy loads without twisting orbuckling. For example, shelving used in bulk storage applications mustbe able to support the weight of densely packed rows of boxes filledwith goods. In such applications, a solid steel sheet deck is a goodchoice for shelving because it has a high load- bearing capacity.

The design and construction of decking or shelving must comply, however,with the requirements of any fire codes applicable to the particularstorage environment. Fire codes generally require that the surface areaof each deck or shelf have a certain amount of open area, e.g., a numberof holes distributed along the surface of the deck or shelf. A solidsteel sheet deck would not meet this “open area” requirement andtherefore could not be used as storage rack shelving or walkway decking.

The “open area” requirement serves two primary objectives from thestandpoint of fire safety and prevention. First, the open area of eachdeck or shelf allows a fire that has broken out to move vertically upthe storage rack instead of spreading horizontally to other storageracks, as the fire would do if it had broken out beneath a solid steelsheet deck. It also allows heat generated by the fire to dissipateinstead of building up within a semi-enclosed space, as would be thecase in a storage space between two solid steel sheet decks. In short,the open area creates a flue space within a storage rack, therebycausing the fire to travel upward and to release heat in the process.This maximizes the effectiveness of the sprinkler system in containingthe fire because it allows the fire to reach the sprinkler heads asquickly as possible without building up too much heat and intensity.

Second, the open area of each deck or shelf allows water from anoverhead sprinkler system to flow downward in the event of a fire. Aslong as water runs freely through the individual decks or shelves, anoverhead sprinkler system can adequately contain a fire breaking out atany shelving level and prevent it from spreading to other storage racks.

The amount of open area generally required by fire codes is fiftypercent (50%) of the surface area. Lower percentages may be allowed,however, depending on the particular storage environment. As pointed outabove, a solid steel sheet deck does not have any open area andtherefore would not meet this “fifty-percent” rule. Consequently, itcould not be used in bulk storage applications even though it has a highload-bearing capacity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention include a corrugated decking having aplurality of top horizontal surfaces, a plurality of bottom surfaces,and a plurality of transition surfaces, each transition surfaceconnecting one of the top horizontal surfaces to one of the bottomsurfaces. One of the top horizontal surfaces has a plurality ofapertures, the apertures having downwardly sloping flanges surroundingeach aperture.

Other embodiments of the invention include a corrugated decking having aplurality of top horizontal surfaces, and a plurality of transitionsurfaces, each transition surface connecting one of the top horizontalsurfaces to another one of the transition surfaces. One of the tophorizontal surfaces has a plurality of apertures, the apertures havingdownwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

This invention is described with reference to the following drawingfigures, where like reference numbers represent like features:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a section of a corrugated deck inaccordance with the invention;

FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the corrugated deck shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a cutaway, cross-sectional view of a strip of corrugated deckin accordance with the invention;

FIG. 4 is a pattern used to create the corrugated deck shown in FIGS. 1and 2;

FIG. 5 is a environmental view of a corrugated deck in accordance withthe invention, as used in a storage rack;

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a section of an example of a corrugateddeck in accordance with the invention;

FIG. 7 is a plan view of an example of an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 is a plan view of example of another embodiment of the invention;and

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an example of an embodiment of theinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The fifty-percent rule necessarily calls for a unique solution to theproblem of providing structural strength to decking or shelving.Solutions currently available in the industry are simply inadequate.

For example, a wire mesh deck, commonly used in industrial andcommercial settings, meets the fifty-percent rule but it deformsrelatively easily under heavy loads because it has no uniform loadingsupport. When it deforms, the deck no longer has a flat surface on whichto rest boxes. It is difficult enough, even with a flat surface, to loadboxes onto a wire mesh deck and to move them from side to side once theyare on the deck. The loss of a flat surface further aggravates thisproblem.

Moreover, a wire mesh deck tends to rip up bulk items, thereby damagingstored goods. Cardboard boxes, carpets, and upholstered goods aresusceptible to damage from punctures and snags as they are loaded ontoor off a wire mesh deck. A wire mesh deck also creates a safety riskbecause the wire ends along the so- called “waterfall” edge that hugsthe support beam can bend up and cut a worker's stray finger or otherbody part.

Wire mesh decks require long lead times for production. They cannot bepacked densely in shipping, and therefore the costs of shipping arehigher than they otherwise could be.

A slatted wooden deck, also commonly used, has disadvantages of its own.Wood burns and smokes readily. It also warps and moves due to moistureand has to be replaced more often than steel. Also, wooden decks are notas strong as steel decks, and the individual slats may break, therebycausing a failure in the structural integrity of the deck and a safetyhazard for workers.

Another bulk storage solution is a roll formed “front to back bar.” Thissolution consists of a roll formed C-channel with welded end plates thatattach to a step beam. This solution is very expensive from amanufacturing standpoint because it uses a lot of heavy gauge steel.Moreover, one still has to use wooden pallets because the solutionitself does not provide a flat storage surface.

Recognizing the disadvantages inherent in wire mesh decks and slattedwooden decks, and the need for decking or shelving that meets fire coderequirements without sacrificing load-bearing capacity, others besidesthe present inventors have experimented with alternative designs andconstructions. Consider the following examples.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,582 to Halstrick discloses storage rack shelving inwhich there are corrugated decks with channels below the top surface forguiding and confining sprinkler fluid. Evenly spaced along the channelsare openings through which sprinkler fluid flows down to the nextshelving level. The decks, however, each have an open area of less thanone-half of 1% of the total deck area. This does not meet thefifty-percent rule.

Indeed, Halstrick's invention expressly teaches away from the use ofopen decking. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,582 considers opendecking to be undesirable because it allows hot air to flow upward andcause a chimney effect. The disclosure points out that Halstrick'sinvention does not permit smoke and gas to flow upwardly. Contrary tothis disclosure and as explained above, open decking actually workstogether with an overhead sprinkler system to contain a fire. When afire breaks out in a storage environment, the fire's natural tendency isto rise, seeking out additional oxygen. Smoke and hot air also rise.They thus find their way to the closest sprinkler head, which activatesand releases a spray of water. The water falls downward, therebycontaining the fire and protecting areas adjacent to where the firestarted. The open decking also allows excess heat to dissipate morerapidly. This is important because a hotter fire will be more difficultfor the sprinkler system to contain, because the water droplets vaporizebefore they make contact with the flames.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,986,462 to Heft discloses shelving units with circularholes uniformly spaced throughout the surface area to permit the passageof water. Each shelving unit derives its structural strength through thepresence of side members depending from the longitudinal edges of thetop portion. Each shelf in turn is made up of several shelving unitsplaced side by side on the beams of the rack. One apparent disadvantagewith this design is the fact that the shelving units must be preciselysized so that they interlock snugly with the rack beams. Anotherdisadvantage of Heft's invention is that the units would beprohibitively expensive to manufacture because of the high cost ofmaterials. The units would also be costly to ship and install.Additionally, the circular holes in the shelving units weaken thestructure such that the design cannot bear heavy loads. The holes alsoturn the shelving units into cheese graters that can damage stored goodsand injure people.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,927,769 to Maslow et al. discloses a shelf made of arectangular sheet of material having raised ribs to support items placedthereon and apertures to permit the flow of air or water. The ribsreinforce the shelf structure. Based on the drawings accompanying thispatent, however, it does not appear that this design would meet thefifty-percent rule generally required by fire codes today.

Bar grating is currently used in warehouse flooring applications toprovide a flooring surface for mezzanines, aisle ways, safety flooringand other flooring that requires a 50% open area to conform to firecodes. However, bar grating is costly and time consuming to produce andinstall.

Despite alternative designs and constructions that have been proposedover the years, as exemplified by the above patents, wire mesh decks andslotted wooden decks are still widely used in industrial and commercialstorage racks and bar grating is still widely used in floor deckingapplications. There have been few attempts to address the needs ofindustry for decking and shelving that meets the fifty-percent rule andyet provides the load-bearing capacity required in bulk storage andflooring applications. Such decking or shelving should also benonflammable and suitable for mass production and shipping at minimalcost.

The invention fulfills all of the above objectives. It offers a simpleand elegant solution to industry requirements of shelving having a largepercentage, for example, fifty-percent, of open area and a structuredesigned to withstand maximum stress with minimum amount of deflection.This invention provides a smooth flat surface for storage of bulk items.Moreover, in the preferred embodiments, this solution can be readilyimplemented with minimal retooling of existing machines for fabricatingmetals and manufactured and shipped at competitive prices.

FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 illustrate features of an example of a corrugated deckin accordance with the invention. As seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, a corrugateddeck 10 has top horizontal surfaces 12, bottom surfaces 14, andtransition surfaces 16. Punched or formed into the top horizontalsurfaces 12 and/or the bottom surfaces 14 are a plurality of apertures18 and 20. Surrounding the apertures 18 and 20 are vertical flanges 22and 24, respectively. Also seen in FIGS. 1 and 2 is a portion of aterminal edge 26 of the corrugated deck.

In FIG. 3, a strip of the corrugated deck shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 hasbeen cut away to show the cross-sectional geometry of the verticalflanges 22 and 24 surrounding the apertures 18 and 20. As one can see,the material of the top horizontal surface 12 surrounding the aperture18 slopes downward, forming the vertical flange 22. The material of thebottom surface 14 surrounding the aperture 20 likewise slopes downward,forming a vertical flange 24.

In the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, the deck is manufactured, forexample, from sheets of galvanized steel commonly used for roofs. Theapertures 18 and 20 are punched into the metal and the surrounding metalis drawn downward to form the vertical flanges 22 and 24.

The manufacture of corrugated decks in accordance with the invention caninvolve the following process. First, the metal sheets are roll formedinto decks and cut to length to a tight tolerance. After the sheets havebeen formed into decks and cut to length, they are sent through thepunching operation. This operation consists of feeding the sheetsthrough a punch press that is equipped with specialized tooling. Thepunch press first punches the holes into the flat surfaces of thesheets, and then draws the metal surrounding the holes downward to formthe vertical flanges, as indicated above.

The punch press works by indexing the sheets. The press will make afirst set of holes in a sheet and then index the sheet forward. Thepress will then make another set of holes in the same sheet and at thesame time draw the metal surrounding the holes that were made in theprevious operation cycle into vertical flanges. The press finishes adeck by making the last set of flanges and pushing the sheet out to bestacked for shipping. This operation can be run with different degreesof automation depending on demand for the product.

FIG. 4 shows the pattern used to create the corrugated deck shown inFIGS. 1 and 2. The size and shape of the apertures, and their frequencyon the top and bottom surfaces, may vary depending upon the percentageof open area required by the applicable fire code, and the specificrequirements of the user (e.g., required load-bearing capacity). Forexample, if the deck needs to have only twenty-percent open area, thenthe top and bottom surfaces could have fewer apertures per row, orsmaller apertures. Accordingly, the number of predetermined patternscreated for corrugated decks of this invention are practicallylimitless, constrained only by fire code and user requirements and/orpreferences.

FIG. 5 depicts a corrugated deck 10 in accordance with the invention aspart of a storage rack 30. Each deck 10 is inserted between two L-shapedsupport beams 32 and rests on the ledges 34 of the support beams. Thedecks are fastened to the support beams with bolts 36. Note that aterminal edge 26 of one deck overlaps with a terminal edge 26 of an-adjacent deck when the decks are properly positioned on and fastened tothe support beams 32.

Although some embodiments of the invention are corrugated decks made ofsheet steel, other materials such as plastic and fiberglass would alsobe suitable. For example, if the deck is made from a durable plastic,the apertures 18 and 20 and the vertical flanges 22 and 24 could beformed by extruding the plastic into a mold or cast of the predeterminedpattern.

The cross-sectional geometry of the vertical flanges 22 and 24 depictedin FIG. 3 can vary. The embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 was modeledwith a computer to ensure that the resulting structures would passstandard tests for stress and deflection. Preferred embodiment and otherdesigns have undergone tests (1) to determine the amount anddistribution of stress and the degree of deflection in typicalload-bearing situations, and (2) to calculate the-rate of flow of liquidthrough the apertures. The first set of tests have confirmed thevalidity of the designs from the standpoint of achieving uniformload-bearing capacity. The second set of tests have demonstrated thatthe rate of flow of water through the apertures greatly exceeds themaximum rate of water discharged by sprinkler systems used in industrialand commercial settings.

FIG. 6 shows an example of perforated decking in accordance with anembodiment of the invention particularly suited for floor decking. It ispreferred in floor decking applications that the distance betweenadjacent top horizontal surfaces 12 be small to help minimize adverseaffects, such as tripping, on people walking on the floor decking. Inthe example shown in FIG. 6, the top horizontal surfaces 12 aresubstantially wider than the bottom surfaces 14 to provide a more stablewalking surface for the user. In addition, some embodiments include asurface treatment 40 to produce a non-skid surface. Examples of surfacetreatment 40 include, but are not limited to, applied non-skidtreatments and protrusions embossed in the surface of the deckingmaterial itself. The surface protrusions can be embossed in apredetermined pattern or randomly.

FIG. 7 is a plan view of an embodiment of the invention having apertures18 in top horizontal surfaces 12 and apertures 20 in bottom surfaces 14.In preferred embodiments, apertures 18 have vertical flanges 22 andapertures 20 have similar vertical flanges. As can be seen from FIG. 7,transition surfaces 16 connect top horizontal surfaces 12 to bottomsurfaces 14 at an angle greater than 90 degrees. In preferredembodiments, this angle is between 90 degrees and 120 degrees, morepreferably between 90 degrees and 110 degrees. This angle is determinedbased on load bearing requirements and deck stackability, which is animportant consideration with regard to shipping costs.

FIG. 8 shows a plan view of another embodiment of the invention. In thisembodiment, the pattern of apertures 18 is not the same for every tophorizontal surface 12. While rounded rectangles are shown as an exampleof an appropriate shape for apertures 18 it is noted that apertures 18can be any shape that provides sufficient open surface area andsufficient load bearing capacity. Similarly, while apertures 20 areshown as circles, it is noted that apertures 20 can be any appropriateshape or size. Unlike FIG. 7, FIG. 8 shows transition surfaces 16 asbeing 90 degrees relative to top horizontal surfaces 12 and bottomsurfaces 14. While this embodiment may not provide efficient stacking ofdecking sheets, it may be desirable for higher load bearingapplications. FIG. 9 shows an embodiment of the invention having tophorizontal surfaces 12 and transition surfaces 16, but no bottomsurfaces 14. In this example, transition surfaces 16 are provided withapertures 21. In preferred embodiments, apertures 21 are provided withvertical flanges similar to vertical flanges 22 of apertures 18 in tophorizontal surfaces 12. It is again noted that the shape and size ofapertures 18 and apertures 21 are only one example of the possible sizesand shapes that can be used.

The corrugated decks of this invention have been shown to be less costlyto manufacture than wire mesh decks and bar grating. They are also moredurable than wire mesh and easier to install than bar grating. Whereasbar grating is usually attached using many clips, decking in accordancewith the invention can simply be screwed to underlying supportstructure.

Although this invention has been described and illustrated in connectionwith certain preferred embodiments, it is to be understood thatmodifications and variations may be made to it without departing fromthe spirit of the invention, as those skilled in this art will readilyunderstand. Such modifications and variations are considered to bewithin the purview and scope of this invention.

1. A corrugated decking, comprising: a plurality of top horizontalsurfaces; a plurality of bottom surfaces; and a plurality of transitionsurfaces, each transition surface connecting one of the top horizontalsurfaces to one of the bottom surfaces, wherein one of the tophorizontal surfaces has a plurality of apertures, the apertures havingdownwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.
 2. The decking ofclaim 1, wherein one of the bottom surfaces has a plurality of apertureshaving downwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.
 3. Thedecking of claim 1, wherein the bottom surfaces are horizontal.
 4. Thedecking of claim 1, wherein the transition surfaces are substantiallyvertical.
 5. The decking of claim 1, wherein the transition surfaces areat an angle of between 90 and 120 degrees relative to the top horizontalsurfaces.
 6. The decking of claim 5, wherein the transition surfaces areat an angle of between 90 and 110 degrees relative to the top horizontalsurfaces.
 7. The decking of claim 1, wherein the transition surfaces areat an angle relative to the top horizontal surfaces such that twoidentical pieces of the decking are stackable with each other and, whenstacked, the bottom surfaces of an upper one of the two pieces ofdecking are below a level of the top horizontal surfaces of a lower oneof the two pieces of decking.
 8. The decking of claim 1, wherein a widthof a first one of the top horizontal surfaces is defined as a distancein a transverse direction between a first point where a first one of thetransition surfaces contacts the first top horizontal surface and asecond point where a second one of the transition surfaces contacts thefirst top horizontal surface, a width of a first valley is defined as adistance in the transverse direction between the second point and athird point where a third one of the transition surfaces contacts asecond one of the top horizontal surfaces, the second top horizontalsurface being adjacent the first top horizontal surface, and the widthof the first top horizontal surface is greater than the width of thefirst valley.
 9. The decking of claim 8, wherein the width of the firsttop horizontal. surface is at least twice the width of the first valley.10. The decking of claim 8, wherein the width of the first valley isless than one inch.
 11. The decking of claim 1, wherein the tophorizontal surfaces have a non-skid surface.
 12. The decking of claim11, wherein the non-skid surface comprises a plurality of shapesembossed in the top horizontal surfaces.
 13. The decking of claim 12,wherein the plurality of shapes embossed in the top horizontal surfacesform a predetermined pattern.
 14. The decking of claim 1, wherein theapertures are arranged in a predetermined pattern.
 15. The decking ofclaim 14, wherein the apertures on a first top horizontal surface arearranged in a first predetermined pattern, the apertures on a second tophorizontal surface are arranged in a second predetermined pattern andthe first predetermined pattern is different than the secondpredetermined pattern.
 16. The decking of claim 1, wherein the aperturesoccupy at least fifty percent of a total area in plan view of the tophorizontal surfaces and the bottom surfaces.
 17. The decking of claim 1,wherein one of the transition surfaces has a plurality of apertureshaving downwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.
 18. Thedecking of claim 1 ; wherein a width of a first one of the tophorizontal surfaces is defined as a distance in a transverse directionbetween a first point where a first one of the transition surfacescontacts the first top horizontal surface and a second point where asecond one of the transition surfaces contacts the first top horizontalsurface, a width of a first valley is defined as a distance in thetransverse direction between the second point and a third point where athird one of the transition surfaces contacts a second one of the tophorizontal surfaces, the second top horizontal surface being adjacentthe first top horizontal surface, the width of the first top horizontalsurface is greater than the width of the first valley, the transitionsurfaces are at an angle relative to the top horizontal surfaces suchthat two identical pieces of the decking are stackable with each otherand, when stacked, the bottom surfaces of an upper one of the two piecesof decking are below a level of the top horizontal surfaces of a lowerone of the two pieces of decking, and the top horizontal surfaces have anon-skid surface, the non-skid surface comprising a plurality of shapesembossed in the top horizontal surfaces.
 19. A storage rack having asshelving the decking of claim
 18. 20. A storage rack having as shelvingthe decking of claim
 1. 21. A floor deck having as decking the deckingof claim
 1. 22. A floor deck having as decking the decking of claim 18.23. A corrugated decking, comprising: a plurality of top horizontalsurfaces; and a plurality of transition surfaces, each transitionsurface connecting one of the top horizontal surfaces to another one ofthe transition surfaces, wherein one of the top horizontal surfaces hasa plurality of apertures, the apertures having downwardly slopingflanges surrounding each aperture.
 24. The decking of claim 23, whereinone of the transition surfaces has a plurality of apertures havingdownwardly sloping flanges surrounding each aperture.
 25. The decking ofclaim 23, wherein the transition surfaces are at an angle of between 90and 120 degrees relative to the top horizontal surfaces.
 26. The deckingof claim 25, wherein the transition surfaces are at an angle of between90 and 110 degrees relative to the top horizontal surfaces.
 27. Thedecking of claim 23, wherein the transition surfaces are at an anglerelative to the top horizontal surfaces such that two identical piecesof the decking are stackable with each other and, when stacked, an edgewhere two of the transition surfaces of an upper one of the two piecesof decking contact each other is below a level of the top horizontalsurfaces of a lower one of the two pieces of decking.
 28. The decking ofclaim 23, wherein a width of a first one of the top horizontal surfacesis defined as a distance in a transverse direction between a first pointwhere a first one of the transition surfaces contacts the first tophorizontal surface and a second point where a second one of thetransition surfaces contacts the first top horizontal surface, a widthof a first valley is defined as a distance in the transverse directionbetween the second point and a third point where a third one of thetransition surfaces contacts a second one of the top horizontalsurfaces, the second top horizontal surface being adjacent the first tophorizontal surface, and the width of the first top horizontal surface isgreater than the width of the first valley.
 29. The decking of claim 28,wherein the width of the first top horizontal surface is at least twicethe width of the first valley.
 30. The decking of claim 28, wherein thewidth of the first valley is less than one inch.
 31. The decking ofclaim 23, wherein the top horizontal surfaces have a non-skid surface.32. The decking of claim 31, wherein the non-skid surface comprises aplurality of shapes embossed in the top horizontal surfaces.
 33. Thedecking of claim 32, wherein the plurality of shapes embossed in the tophorizontal surfaces form a predetermined pattern.
 34. The decking ofclaim 23, wherein the apertures are arranged in a predetermined pattern.35. The decking of claim 34, wherein the apertures on a first tophorizontal surface are arranged in a first predetermined pattern, theapertures on a second top horizontal surface are arranged in a secondpredetermined pattern and the first predetermined pattern is differentthan the second predetermined pattern.
 36. The decking of claim 23,wherein the apertures occupy at least fifty percent of a total area inplan view of the top horizontal surfaces and the transition surfaces.37. The decking of claim 23, wherein a width of a first one of the tophorizontal surfaces is defined as a distance in a transverse directionbetween a first point where a first one of the transition surfacescontacts the first top horizontal surface and a second point where asecond one of the transition surfaces contacts the first top horizontalsurface, a width of a first valley is defined as a distance in thetransverse direction between the second point and a third point where athird one of the transition surfaces contacts a second one of the tophorizontal surfaces, the second top horizontal surface being adjacentthe first top horizontal surface, the width of the first top horizontalsurface is greater than the width of the first valley, the transitionsurfaces are at an angle relative to the top horizontal surfaces suchthat two identical pieces of the decking are stackable with each otherand, when stacked, an edge where two of the transition surfaces of anupper one of the two pieces of decking contact each other is below alevel of the top horizontal surfaces of a lower one of the two pieces ofdecking, and the top horizontal surfaces have a non-skid surface, thenon-skid surface comprising a plurality of shapes embossed in the tophorizontal surfaces.
 38. A storage rack having as shelving the deckingof claim
 36. 39. A storage rack having as shelving the decking of claim23.
 40. A floor deck having as decking the decking of claim
 23. 41. Afloor deck having as decking the decking of claim 36.